In a groundbreaking study published in Nature Food, researchers from the University of British Columbia Okanagan (UBCO) have unveiled that staple crops grown in Canada—specifically wheat, canola (rapeseed), and peas—boast some of the lowest carbon footprints globally. Their carbon emissions are remarkably so minimal that, in certain comparisons, these crops can be shipped to Europe up to seventeen times over before their total emissions equal those of the very same crops cultivated domestically in European countries. This revelation challenges conventional narratives around “food miles” and spotlights the complexities underlying sustainable agriculture and global food supply chains.

The research, spearheaded by Dr. Nicole Bamber of UBCO’s Irving K. Barber Faculty of Science, meticulously measured and compared full life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with these three crops across multiple countries: Canada, France, Germany, Australia, and the United States. The team employed the ISO 14067 standard for calculating carbon footprints, ensuring consistent and internationally recognized environmental reporting. The use of this rigorous standard allowed for an accurate and comprehensive quantification encompassing all stages from fertilizer production, field activities, to soil emissions.

Central to the study’s findings is the significant role that soil carbon sequestration and nitrous oxide emissions play in determining the overall carbon footprint of crop production. Canadian farming practices, particularly in the Prairies, have evolved extensively over recent decades to emphasize conservation tillage methods, including low and no-till agriculture. These techniques minimize soil disturbance, thereby increasing the soil’s capacity to store carbon rather than release it into the atmosphere. Additionally, Western Canada’s climatic conditions—characterized by cooler temperatures and less moisture—further reduce nitrous oxide emissions, a potent greenhouse gas much more impactful than CO₂ when it comes to global warming potential.

.adsslot_4ZBg91fKUE{width:728px !important;height:90px !important;}
@media(max-width:1199px){ .adsslot_4ZBg91fKUE{width:468px !important;height:60px !important;}
}
@media(max-width:767px){ .adsslot_4ZBg91fKUE{width:320px !important;height:50px !important;}
}

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Bamber highlights that transportation emissions, often the focal point of public discussions about food sustainability, comprise only a fractional component of a crop’s overall carbon footprint. “Local is always lower-carbon” is a simplistic mantra that fails to account for the broader lifecycle impacts embedded within agricultural production itself. The full environmental impact of crop cultivation—covering energy and materials used during fertilization, machinery operations, as well as emissions from soil nitrogen transformation—is far more consequential than the distance food travels to market.

Complementing Dr. Bamber’s work, Dr. Ian Turner and Dr. Nathan Pelletier, prominent figures in food systems sustainability research at UBCO, underscored the deliberate choices behind Canadian agriculture’s enviable environmental performance. Their joint effort within the Food Systems Priority Research for Integrated Sustainability Management Lab illustrates that these advantages stem not only from favorable environmental conditions but also from proactive policy frameworks and innovative farming practices. This integrated approach fosters carbon sinks in soils, while simultaneously reducing nitrous oxide release.

The research team conducted detailed life-cycle assessments (LCAs) accounting for variable factors such as fertilizer formulation, field-level emissions, and soil organic carbon fluxes, culminating in an exhaustive analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from production to the farm gate. Additionally, they calculated break-even transport distances, estimating how far Canadian crops can be shipped abroad before their overall carbon footprint equals production emissions of equivalent crops grown domestically in importing countries. This aspect is particularly critical as global markets increasingly weigh sustainability credentials in procurement decisions.

Canada’s ability to produce lower-emission crops offers a strategic competitive edge in the global agri-food marketplace, where environmental sustainability is becoming an indispensable criterion for consumers, retailers, and governments alike. This study invites a reevaluation of “food miles” as a sole metric for sustainable consumption, advocating a more nuanced approach that integrates production efficiencies and lifecycle emissions into purchasing and policy frameworks. By disentangling the components of carbon footprint attributed to farming versus transport, the research provides actionable insights for reducing food system greenhouse gases worldwide.

The implications for climate policy and agricultural strategy are profound. Shifting consumer and trade focus towards foods with genuinely low lifecycle emissions could drastically reduce the carbon impact of global diets. Canada’s example demonstrates that emissions reductions are achievable through a combination of soil management, crop selection, and environmental stewardship. This could stimulate further investments in conservation agriculture technologies and encourage other countries to adopt similar climate-smart farming practices tailored to their local environments.

Moreover, this research challenges the public’s intuitive belief that locally grown food always equates to a smaller carbon footprint. It presents an evidence-based case study that stresses the necessity of considering the entire supply chain—from seed to shelf—when assessing environmental impacts. This holistic perspective may recalibrate sustainability certifications, supply chain audits, and consumer education campaigns around food.

The study, set to be published on August 5, 2025, in Nature Food, has been recognized for its meticulous methodology and international relevance. Dr. Pelletier notes, “Canada’s production advantages aren’t accidental—they result from deliberate farming choices, supportive policies, and environmental conditions.” As global agriculture grapples with the dual challenge of meeting food demand and mitigating climate change, insights from this research are poised to reshape industry approaches and policy formulations worldwide.

In essence, the findings from UBCO serve as a clarion call to rethink how we define and measure sustainability in food systems. The intersection of agronomy, environmental science, and economics illuminated in this work exemplifies how scientific rigor combined with practical policy and farm management can drive substantial climate benefits. As sustainability increasingly drives consumer and regulatory preferences, research of this caliber is vital to steering global food production toward a greener future.

Subject of Research: Not applicable

Article Title: Rapeseed, wheat and peas grown in Canada have considerably lower carbon footprints than those from major international competitors

News Publication Date: 5-Aug-2025

Web References:

Nature Food article
DOI link

Image Credits: UBC Okanagan

Keywords: carbon footprint, sustainable agriculture, conservation tillage, nitrous oxide emissions, soil carbon sequestration, life-cycle assessment, food miles, carbon sinks, greenhouse gases, crop production, Canadian agriculture, environmental impact

Tags: Canadian agriculture carbon footprintenvironmental reporting in agriculturefood miles and sustainabilitygreenhouse gas emissions in agricultureinternational crop emissions standardslife-cycle assessment of cropsnitrous oxide emissions in farmingsoil carbon sequestration benefitssustainable crop production Canadatransatlantic shipping emissions comparisonUBCO research on cropswheat canola peas carbon impact