In recent years, the urgency to understand and mitigate the environmental impacts of agriculture has intensified, particularly concerning the dairy industry, one of the most globally significant food sectors. A focal point of current research is the quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural systems, which is critical for developing effective climate action plans. Among these, the role of peatlands—especially those used for dairy farming—has emerged as a vital but often underestimated factor. A groundbreaking study by Müller, Kiese, and Scheer (2025) provides compelling evidence that emissions originating from drained peatlands substantially influence the carbon footprint of European dairy farming, calling for a paradigm shift in how life cycle assessments (LCAs) are conducted.

Peatlands are unique wetland ecosystems characterized by the accumulation of organic matter over millennia due to slow decomposition under waterlogged, anaerobic conditions. These landscapes store vast amounts of carbon, acting as significant natural carbon sinks. However, when peatlands are drained for agricultural use, particularly for dairy farming, the organic soils become exposed to oxygen, accelerating the decomposition of stored carbon and releasing large quantities of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This release fundamentally alters the emissions profile of agricultural land use yet remains largely disregarded in conventional dairy LCA models.

Traditionally, LCAs assessing the carbon footprint of dairy products have focused on direct emissions such as enteric methane from cows, nitrous oxide from fertilizer application, and carbon dioxide from farm machinery and feed production. These assessments tend to overlook land-use change emissions, especially from peatland degradation, which can be an influential source of GHGs. The omission arises partly from the complexity of measuring peatland emissions and the absence of standardized methodologies to incorporate these emissions adequately into dairy system assessments. As a result, the carbon footprint of dairy products has often been underestimated, leading to incomplete or skewed interpretations of sustainability performance.

.adsslot_vOeRNXZ84G{width:728px !important;height:90px !important;}
@media(max-width:1199px){ .adsslot_vOeRNXZ84G{width:468px !important;height:60px !important;}
}
@media(max-width:767px){ .adsslot_vOeRNXZ84G{width:320px !important;height:50px !important;}
}

ADVERTISEMENT

This study underscores the critical importance of integrating emissions from drained peatlands into LCAs of dairy farms to establish a more comprehensive and accurate carbon accounting framework. The authors argue that excluding these emissions provides a distorted view that can mislead policy-makers, producers, and consumers alike, potentially obstructing the development and implementation of effective mitigation strategies targeted at reducing the dairy sector’s climate impact. The recalibration of life cycle models to reflect peatland emissions is thus not merely a technical adjustment but a necessity for credible sustainability claims.

Compounding the challenge is that drained peatlands continue to release carbon regardless of farm management intensity, representing a persistent source of emissions that can offset gains achieved through other mitigation measures like improved animal feed efficiency or manure management. This persistent nature demands urgent attention as European dairy systems transition toward ambitious climate targets. Comprehensive emission inventories that account for this ongoing peat soil carbon loss are essential for understanding the full GHG balance of dairy farming landscapes.

Moreover, the paper highlights the technical dilemma posed by current reporting standards and guidelines. These frameworks largely lack clear, harmonized protocols for capturing peatland emissions in agricultural carbon accounting. Without standardized approaches, data comparability across studies and countries remains limited, hampering the global benchmarking of dairy sustainability. The authors call for a concerted effort among researchers, policy-makers, and industry stakeholders to establish unified guidelines that integrate peatland emissions seamlessly into GHG inventories.

The synthesis presented also points to the future challenges in data acquisition and model development necessary to realize this integrated approach. Accurate quantification requires longitudinal field measurements and remote sensing methods capable of monitoring peatland status and associated emissions dynamics in real-time. Advances in technology and novel computational models could facilitate high-resolution spatial and temporal emission estimates, enhancing the precision of dairy system LCAs. Collaboration across disciplines, combining soil science, agronomy, climatology, and ecological modeling, will be crucial to refining the representation of peatland-related emissions.

Importantly, the study emphasizes that acknowledging peatland emissions does not aim to penalize dairy producers but rather to enable informed decision-making for effective climate strategies. By revealing the hidden carbon costs embedded in drained peatlands, stakeholders can prioritize land management practices that restore peat ecosystems or explore alternative land-use options to reduce overall environmental burdens. This insight aligns with broader climate goals and can inspire innovation within the dairy sector for sustainability transformations.

Integrating peatland emissions into carbon footprint assessments also provides a more transparent communication framework for consumers increasingly concerned about the environmental impacts of their food choices. Labels and certifications grounded in rigorous LCAs that include all relevant emission sources enhance trust and empower consumers to support environmentally responsible products. In turn, this market-driven change could stimulate the adoption of best practices that mitigate peat degradation and carbon loss.

Furthermore, this approach has implications beyond the dairy sector. Peatlands are widespread across many European agricultural landscapes, and their degradation affects emissions from various land-use types. Robust methodologies developed for dairy systems could be adapted to crop production and mixed farming systems, facilitating a holistic view of agriculture’s role in climate dynamics. This systems-level perspective is vital for aligning agricultural policies with the EU’s commitments under the European Green Deal and climate neutrality ambitions.

The insights garnered from this study also draw attention to potential synergies between peatland conservation and biodiversity objectives. Restoring drained peatlands can contribute to habitat preservation, water regulation, and ecosystem resilience while simultaneously reducing GHG emissions. Consequently, enhanced emission accounting could support multi-objective land management policies that optimize environmental benefits across sectors.

This re-examination of dairy carbon footprints marks a significant step towards more scientifically robust and policy-relevant climate assessments. It challenges assumptions held for decades and invites the research community to refine existing LCA methodologies to reflect emerging evidence on peatland emissions. The implications stretch from grassroots farming practices to high-level policy development, underscoring the interdependence of environmental science and sustainable development.

In summary, the work by Müller, Kiese, and Scheer advocates for expanding the boundaries of dairy carbon footprint assessments to fully capture the overlooked yet substantial emissions from drained peatlands. Their call for standardized guidelines, improved emission inventories, and critical reassessments of reporting standards resonates deeply at a time when agriculture must reconcile productivity with environmental stewardship. As the climate crisis accelerates, such integrative research will be indispensable in forging resilient food systems that safeguard the planet’s future.

Subject of Research:
Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint assessments in European dairy farming, focusing on the impact of drained peatlands.

Article Title:
Carbon footprints of European dairy farming: the role of drained peatlands in GHG assessments.

Article References:

Müller, AL., Kiese, R. & Scheer, C. Carbon footprints of European dairy farming: the role of drained peatlands in GHG assessments.
npj Sustain. Agric. 3, 44 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00085-x

Image Credits: AI Generated

Tags: agricultural greenhouse gas mitigationcarbon storage in wetland ecosystemsclimate action plans agriculturedairy farming carbon footprintdairy industry sustainability challengesdrained peatlands environmental impactEuropean dairy farming emissionsgreenhouse gas emissions agriculturelife cycle assessments dairy industryorganic matter decomposition peatlandspeatland drainage effectspeatlands as carbon sinks