Microplastics have turned up in moss from almost every corner of the United Kingdom, according to a new nationwide survey that found plastic particles at 49 of 52 sites sampled, including some of the country’s most remote landscapes. The findings, published in the journal Microplastics and Nanoplastics by researchers at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, provide the first national baseline of airborne microplastic contamination measured directly in moss, and they point to a diffuse atmospheric source capable of carrying plastic particles tens to hundreds of kilometres from where they were emitted.

What makes the result so striking is not the concentration of plastic, which the researchers describe as relatively low, but its sheer ubiquity. The survey deliberately excluded locations near roads, houses and intensive agriculture, sampling only semi-natural and rural habitats at least 300 metres from main roads and 100 metres from any dwelling. The team reasoned that if microplastics turned up in these places, local sources such as tyre wear or litter could not explain them. Only three sites fell below the limits of detection: near Thetford in Norfolk, Wivenhoe Woods in Essex and Warkworth in Northumberland. Everywhere else, the moss had intercepted plastic falling from the sky.

The mean concentration across all sites where microplastics were detected was 4.52 particles per gram of dry moss, with a standard deviation of 4.11, spanning three orders of magnitude from 0.33 to 24.92 particles per gram. Perhaps most counterintuitive, the most contaminated moss was not collected from cities. Some of the highest concentrations were recorded at Ward Hill in Scotland and in rural northwest Wales. Among the three genuinely urban locations sampled, in Sutton Park, Liverpool and Manchester, none ranked among the top contaminated sites, taking 5th, 17th and 32nd place respectively out of 52.

Moss makes an unusually good sampler for this kind of pollution. Species such as Hypnum cupressiforme and Pleurozium schreberi have feathery, branching fronds with a very high surface area relative to their mass, and they draw almost nothing from the substrate beneath them, meaning nearly everything found on their surfaces arrived from the air. The International Cooperative Programme on Effects of Air Pollution on Natural Vegetation and Crops has exploited these properties for decades, running European moss surveys every five years to map deposition of trace metals, nitrogen and persistent organic pollutants. An Irish pilot study in 2015 first suggested the same logic could apply to plastic fibres, finding them in every moss sample tested. What was missing until now was a method rigorous enough to identify the plastics chemically and to process enough moss to make the results representative.

That technical hurdle was the core of the new work. Conventional microplastics analysis usually relies on chemically digesting a sample to strip away organic material, leaving plastic particles intact for spectroscopic identification. But when the team tried this on moss, a Fenton’s reaction of hydrogen peroxide and iron failed to break down some species even after 24 hours, and the approach capped the analysable sample at under a gram of moss, far too little to be representative when particle counts are low. The researchers instead developed a flow displacement technique, flushing up to 10 grams of moss in a sight-glass chamber with 100 litres of 5-micrometre-filtered deionised water at roughly 8 litres per minute. The running water physically dislodges particles trapped in the moss structure, which are then captured on a stainless steel filter with 5-micrometre pores before a Fenton’s reaction cleans up residual organic matter.

The resulting concentrate was deposited onto silver membrane filters and analysed with Fourier Transform Infrared microscopy, or µ-FTIR, a vibrational spectroscopy technique that identifies polymers by matching their infrared spectra against libraries of known plastics. A PerkinElmer Spotlight 400 instrument mapped the filters at a pixel size of 25 micrometres, meaning only particles of at least that size could be resolved, and machine-learning software automated the spectral matching across 21 common polymers, from polypropylene and polyethylene to PVC, polystyrene and polyurethane. The automation also removes operator bias, a persistent problem in manually scored microscopy studies. To corroborate the polymer assignments, the team re-examined 11 larger particles from 5 samples with a second infrared technique, laser direct infrared spectroscopy, and confirmed the identities across both instruments for four polymer types.

The method itself was put through its paces. Procedural blanks produced only a handful of background particles, yielding detection limits between roughly 0.08 and 0.9 particles per gram of moss depending on polymer type. Spike-recovery tests with 45-micrometre polystyrene spheres added to 5 grams of moss returned recoveries averaging 97 percent after the full 100-litre flush, indicating the technique reliably displaces even particles close to the analytical size floor. Importantly, tests on the residue left in sampling bags after moss was removed found negligible microplastics, showing the particles are firmly locked within the moss and not shed during transport, handling or storage.

As for what plastics are falling on Britain’s countryside, polyurethane dominated, accounting for 37.54 percent of all particles detected, followed by cellulose acetate at 20 percent and the ethylene-vinyl-acetate copolymer at 13.17 percent. PVC and PET contributed 8.77 and 4.56 percent respectively. Polyurethane’s ubiquity is consistent with its enormous range of applications, from foam insulation and coatings to fabric laminates and furnishings, while cellulose acetate fibres are the stuff of cigarette filters, one of the most commonly littered items in Europe. The team also noted that polyethylene, one of the world’s highest-volume plastics, was absent from all samples above detection limits, possibly because its spectrum closely resembles that of EVAc, which was widely detected.

Statistical analysis supported the integrity of the survey design. Redundancy analysis found that latitude was the only significant predictor of microplastic abundance, explaining a modest share of the variation, with an urban index close to but not meeting the significance threshold. Crucially, the two most frequently sampled moss species, Pleurozium schreberi and Hylocomium splendens, showed no significant difference in the concentrations they recorded, meaning the mixed-species approach does not compromise comparisons across sites. Kriging and semi-variogram analysis revealed little spatial autocorrelation between sampling points, confirming that the pragmatic density of one sample per 5,000 square kilometres avoided redundancy: fewer sites would have risked missing the true heterogeneity of the deposition pattern.

The concentration range reported here also aligns with the wider literature. Previous studies using optical microscopy on mosses and lichens have generally reported levels in the low tens of particles per gram, consistent with the UK findings, while a single Raman microscopy study in France that pushed detection down to sub-micrometre sizes recorded dramatically higher counts, around 128,863 particles per gram, roughly 90 percent of them smaller than 15 micrometres. That comparison underlines a key caveat of the new work: it quantifies only particles of 25 micrometres and above, the operational limit of the µ-FTIR approach. The smaller fraction, which matters most for inhalation exposure, remains essentially invisible to this method.

The authors are careful about what the survey does and does not demonstrate. It establishes a baseline snapshot rather than a trend, and it was not designed to apportion sources. But the mechanistic picture is coherent. Estimates from urban atmospheric samplers in London suggest fibrous and non-fibrous microplastics larger than 100 micrometres typically travel between 12 and 60 kilometres before deposition, and studies of moss and lichen gradients point to regional sources within 10 to 100 kilometres as the dominant driver of contamination at background sites. A diffuse atmospheric supply of plastic, arriving from regional rather than hyper-local sources, is the most plausible explanation for near-ubiquitous contamination across rural Britain.

The work also carries practical implications for anyone hoping to monitor plastic pollution at national scale. Because moss is cheap to collect, does not require power or specialised equipment in the field, and integrates deposition over several years of growth in only the last two to three segments of the plant, it offers a far more tractable alternative to conventional wet and dry deposition samplers, which are expensive, power-hungry and impractical at remote locations. The survey itself was partly made possible by volunteers and site managers who collected composite samples of ten moss subsamples per location during Covid-19 travel restrictions, illustrating how distributed monitoring networks could be assembled at modest cost.

The researchers argue that the technique extends the reach of the existing ICP Vegetation monitoring protocol, which historically focused on visually identifying microfibres. By combining chemically specific spectroscopy with a sample preparation method that preserves enough mass for statistical robustness, the approach can now capture small plastic fragments indistinguishable by the human eye. Future work, the authors suggest, should focus on tracing the sources of these deposited plastics, extending detection to smaller particles through techniques such as Raman microscopy or mass spectrometry, and repeating the survey over time to detect whether the atmospheric plastic load is rising, falling or shifting in composition. For now, the message is clear: there is nowhere in the British countryside, however remote, where the air is free of plastic.

Subject of Research: Using moss as a biomonitor to survey and quantify airborne microplastic deposition across rural and semi-natural sites in the United Kingdom, including method development for extracting and identifying microplastics by µ-FTIR spectroscopy.

Subject of Research: Technology and Engineering

Article Title: Monitoring moss reveals widespread deposition of airborne microplastics across the UK

Article References: Cross, R. K., Cox, R., Roberts, S. L., Howard, A., Sharps, K., & Hayes, F. (2026). Monitoring moss reveals widespread deposition of airborne microplastics across the UK. Microplastics and Nanoplastics, 6(1), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00191-8

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s43591-026-00191-8

Keywords: microplastics, moss biomonitoring, atmospheric deposition, µ-FTIR spectroscopy, UK moss survey, polymer identification, flow displacement method, air quality, cellulose acetate, polyurethane, environmental monitoring, plastic pollution

Cite Scienmag News

APA
MLA
Chicago

Denise Maddox. (September 10, 2026). Moss surveys show airborne microplastics deposited widely across the UK. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/moss-surveys-show-airborne-microplastics-deposited-widely-across-the-uk/

Copy citation
Download RIS

Tags: Airborne microplastics in mossAirborne microplastics in UK moss surveyatmospheric transport of microplasticsbaseline data on airborne plastic contaminationbaseline data on atmospheric microplastic pollutiondiffuse atmospheric microplastic sourcesdiffuse sources of airborne microplasticsenvironmental impact of microplasticsenvironmental impact of microplastics in UKimplications for ecological and human healthimplications for environmental monitoringlong-distance transport of microplasticslong-range transport of plastic particlesmicroplastic contamination detection methodsmicroplastic contamination measurement methodsmicroplastic deposition in mossmicroplastic deposition in rural habitatsmicroplastic pollution in remote landscapesmicroplastics in moss from remote areasmicroplastics in rural and semi-natural environmentsmoss as bioindicator for airborne microplasticsremote landscape microplastic contaminationUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology researchUK nationwide pollution survey