Controversy in South Carolina: Animal Rescuers Face Charges After Euthanizing Dog Without Owner’s Consent

A heated legal and ethical debate is unfolding in Greenville County, South Carolina, where two women are facing serious criminal charges for allegedly removing a 13-year-old dog from private property and having it euthanized—without the owner’s knowledge or consent.

Source: YouTube

Ashley Raymond and Elizabeth Farmer Waldrop, both associated with Anakin’s Trails Stray and Pet Recovery, say their actions were motivated by compassion. In a statement posted to the organization’s Facebook page, they explained that they found the elderly dog, whom they named Max, tied up behind a property in visibly poor condition. Believing the dog was in distress, they brought him to a veterinarian, where he was diagnosed with advanced heartworms and heart failure. The group claims the vet recommended euthanasia, and the women followed that advice, believing they were sparing Max further suffering.

The post defended the women’s actions, calling the charges “ridiculous and unwarranted,” and described the situation as an effort to save a dog in dire need.

But law enforcement sees it differently.

Source: YouTube

According to arrest warrants issued by the Greenville County Sheriff’s Office, the women allegedly trespassed onto the property on July 16, cut a rope that was being used to tether the dog, and took him without permission. The documents state they then arranged for the dog to be euthanized without notifying or obtaining consent from the rightful owner.

Raymond and Waldrop have been charged with a range of offenses, including stealing or killing an identified dog, trespassing, criminal conspiracy, and malicious injury to animals. Both were arrested and later released on bond following a hearing.

As of now, the dog’s owner is not under investigation, although lingering questions about the animal’s living conditions have sparked concern.

The case has ignited passionate reactions online. Supporters of the women commend their compassion and argue they were acting in the best interest of a suffering animal. Critics, however, emphasize that taking and euthanizing someone’s pet without legal authority or consent crosses a dangerous line, regardless of the circumstances.

Source: YouTube

As the investigation continues, many are watching closely, hoping the full truth will come to light and justice—however it’s defined—will be served.

Click the video below to watch the full story:

This content was created with AI assistance and edited by the iHeartDogs team.